- Z-Pack đ
- Posts
- The CIA's tricks that everyone should know
The CIA's tricks that everyone should know
What we can learn from the CIAâs spy games
Welcome to Z-Pack:.1 topic, 1 day a week, 5 minutes. Easy to consume and fast-actingâĄď¸
If this is your first Z-Pack, welcome - I'm Zach.
âŹď¸ Letâs get it

The CIA's tricks that everyone should know
The CIA has done a lot of bad things, but they were good at being bad, as Walter White (Breaking Bad) once said.
How were they good at these bad things, like disrupting and targeting activists? By infiltrating and acting incompetent af in activistsâ meetings, like this goober pictured below â

Howâd they act incompetent? Activist groups would meet to make decisions (as groups who are trying to get stuff done tend to do), so the CIA would infiltrate undercover and make these meetings as unproductive as possible â drawing out them out as long as possible, trying to get way too many people involved in easy decisions, etc.
The CIA manual on disrupting activist groups largely explains most meetings in academia.
â Alastair Kocho-Williams (@akochowi)
11:01 PM ⢠Jul 2, 2024
If youâve ever been in a painfully long, unproductive meeting before, you know exactly what Iâm talking about.
These annoying tactics employed by the CIA (and unintentionally exemplified by Michael Scott in The Office) show how good things (like collaboration, hashing things out in meetings) can be abused and twisted into bad things (too many opinions, long and repetitive conversations), which keep anything productive from getting done.
Weâve all suffered from people at work who happen to be unintentionally acting like an annoying CIA agent.
And I hate to inform that tons of federal agencies and local and state governments are (unintentionally) employing these same CIA practices when it comes to approving development projects like housing, bridges, etc.
This is known as â
Permitting.
You probably have no idea wtf this means, and thatâs ok đ
Hereâs a steroid shot to the brain of what Iâm talking about:
Lots of things in the world need to get built - roads, factories, offices, homes, etc.
But these things cost money to build.
And meetings have to happen and procedures have to be followed to be able to start construction. Every country has their own way of regulating these things.
These procedures and regulations require companies to fill out paperwork, and depending on the country (like the U.S.), you sometimes have to do LOTS of paperwork and dances.
But no one really thinks about this part.
Like when you see a photo of the Empire State Building, you donât think âwow, they mustâve filled out thousands of pages of paperwork to comply with regulations, like making sure the building wouldnât disrupt the flight patterns of the rare Maroon Pigeon or the underground nest of the Wily Mammoth Ant.â
NO!
You DONâT have those thoughts because thatâs an INSANE thing to think about.
But paperwork of all kinds is needed to make things happen all around us â a bar applying to get a liquor license, a food truck getting inspected, an apartment building being âup to codeâ - this is all basically permitting.
Itâs ~obviously~ good to have some rules and procedures in place, like making sure to protect endangered species, for example.
But, as you saw with the CIAâs tactics listed above, there should be limits, or these rules and regulations can be abused pretty easily.
For example, this law called National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, for short) was passed decades ago out of the good intention of protecting the environment. Before building great things like bridges or clean energy projects, federal agencies would have to comply with this law by filling out paperwork to assess the projectâs potential impact on the environment.
This sounds nice. But this law kind of sucks, in contrast to the other dope things passed in the late 60s and 70s, like the Clean Water Act, Endangered Animals Act, and Clear Air Act.
Why does it suck? Because now it takes YEARS and tons of money to improve and build things that involve the federal government, which is a lot of stuff!
Plus, there are other laws inspired by NEPA that make it harder for private businesses to build things.
Just look below at this 4,000 page environmental review that took THREE YEARS to complete for measuring the impact of NYCâs congestion pricing đ
Or how the city of Charlotte spent ELEVEN YEARS filling out an environmental impact statement (paperwork) to expand itâs rail system.
Not only is it a mortal sin to force anyone to write something longer than a Game of Thrones book as a boring ass government report, but the worst part is that laws like NEPA are stopping us from saving the world.
We passed laws like the Endangered Animals Act decades ago because we were polluting and damaging the environment, so we needed some good regulation.
Air quality used to be really bad, so we made it way better. We had to conserve and clean up.
But times have changed. The things that got us to here will not get us to the future. Now our biggest challenge is reducing carbon emissions to zero.
Conservation, like national parks, is still super important, and we can and should keep doing this. But these regulations shouldnât delay good projects by years and years.
To reduce carbon emissions to zero, we have to build more clean energy projects and denser cities (sprawl = lots more pollution)
There will be no environment to conserve if we donât reduce our carbon emissions.
China, of all countries, knows this, which is why theyâre building solar like crazy â
But we in the U.S. have gotten really bad at building things quickly, especially housing and infrastructure. This is why Kamala Harris has tried changing our labeling of the housing crisis to a housing shortage **queen shit**
Weâre especially bad at building things in blue states (sad âšď¸), because these state and local governments have put in place tons of excess regulation. Theyâve also given tons of decision-making power to small groups that block new projects and developments (like usually older, wealthier white folks that donât like new housing because of concerns about âneighborhood character,â even though this means younger families donât get affordable homes).
This is why the housing shortages are so bad in places like NYC and California and not Texas - they donât build enough housing to keep up with demand.
10 years ago, there were fewer housing units in Austin than in San FranciscoâToday, Austin has 20% more housing units than SF.
Seattle & Charlotte have been steadily closing in and also might be able to pass SF over the next few years.
â Joey Politano đłď¸âđ (@JosephPolitano)
4:10 PM ⢠Sep 25, 2024
Theyâre also bad at building out clean energy, like solar, compared to red states like Texas.
Look at Texas letting it rip baby
This is why Iâm mad at Biden.
The other week, Congress passed some great legislation to reform permitting laws like NEPA, but Biden may veto it.
Here's a real example of the cost of doing nothing about permitting, from policy guy Alec Stapp:
- In 2001, US Forest Service wanted to do a wildfire prevention project
- But first, the agency had to go through NEPA
- Before they could finish, half the forest burned down
Iâm not saying we should recklessly build things anywhere and any time weâd like, but this status quo is the bigger evil by keeping us from getting to a future full housing, up-to-date infrastructure, and clean energy!
So donât act like a CIA asshole at work and support building something new!
Thanks for taking the Pack,
Zach
So what'd you think? |
Before you go â itâd mean the world to me if you could share Z-Pack with just 1 person who you think would enjoy it too.
Please share and encourage them to subscribe - thank you 𫶠https://zpack.beehiiv.com/subscribe

Moo Deng noooooo
â hope hopes hoping (@hopes_revenge)
9:01 PM ⢠Sep 24, 2024
đ¤ If you got this from a friend, sign up here
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice or recommendation for any investment. The Content is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Reply