- Z-Pack đ
- Posts
- How Ukraine will affect your personal wealth
How Ukraine will affect your personal wealth
Explaining this to my girlfriend
Welcome to Z-Pack:.learn about 1 topic, once a week, in 5 minutes (well, about 10-15 minutes for todayâs đŹ). Easy to consume and fast-actingâĄď¸
If this is your first Z-Pack, welcome - I'm Zach.
âŹď¸ Letâs get it

How Ukraine will affect your personal wealth
Iâm just gonna say it â todayâs post will take you ~10-15 minutes to read, but youâll understand the world better!!!
As Tupac once said, âall eyes on me Ukraine.â
I was chatting with my girlfriend the other night, and I brought up my biggest fear (casual) â World War III.
I get it I get it - you may think that sounds crazy and dramatic.
She asked me what I meant by World War III, so hereâs what I told her:
A world led by the U.S. is better than the alternatives.
When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, many believed we had reached what political scientist Francis Fukuyama called "the end of history" â a new era where liberal democracy and free markets would gradually spread across the globe. Woohoo!
But mister smart guy Fukuyama may have been wrong.
The current, dominant power of the world is the United States (duh) - countries everywhere aspire to be like the U.S. and get a taste of the secret sauce that has made the U.S. the most powerful, prosperous country in history, despite our problems.
The U.S. also (typically) pushes for good things, like human rights, democracy, freedom of speech (very dope), and economic prosperity (capitalism).
In the real world, every choice we make has alternatives.
When youâre ordering at a restaurant, you have to choose from the menu. You canât just barrel into Taco Bell and demand a Crispy Chicken Pizza Burrito Supreme.
When it comes to who could be the dominant military power of the world besides the United States, you should know about the other⌠menu options.
**EVIL STAR WARS MUSIC** the Axis of Upheaval (or Evil) = China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
But the biggest threat here is China (on the bench is Russia tho). Iran and North Korea are more like the groupies, coming off like Totinoâs Pizza Rolls â small and harmless, in comparison.
If you didnât know already, the countries in the Axis of Upheaval (specifically China and Russia) are run by dictators.
Thereâs no Congress that can be voted in or out, or freedom of assembly or speech. On top of that, these countries want to conquer (many) other countries.
My girlfriendâs response: âWoah. But why do China and Russia want to do this??? Economically that doesnât even make sense..â
I agree! But dictators donât have to answer to âeconomic senseâ when theyâre the ones running the show.
These two, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, have ambitions, dreams, and ideologies.
What sucks is that lots of Russians and Chinese may agree with my girlfriend - it doesnât make any sense to invade other countries in todayâs world, but their voices donât matter, because they donât live in democracies and get to vote people in or out of office.
Xi and Putin can do what they want, as long as it keeps them in power, which is their #1 priority as a dictator.
And they donât gaf, man.
These naughty boys have one thing in mind - restoring their empires to their âformer glory.â
Why? Letâs start with Putin. For him, countries like Ukraine, Estonia, Moldova, Poland, etc. arenât countries â theyâre masses of land waiting to be taken back to where they belong = Putinâs notion of his Russian empire. To him, it sounds so great! Heâs made this clear in many speeches and even his hilarious âinterviewâ with Tucker Carlson.
And dictators driven by these dreams (not the good kind, like MLKâs) are capable of doing terrible things, because theyâre willing to pay whatever the cost:

For China, Xi Jinping whistles a similar tune â to âreviveâ his country to its former glory, which involves taking over Taiwan and âsolvingâ other âterritorial disputes,â like taking land that belongs to Vietnam, India, Malaysia, Brunei, and U.S. allies, like Japan and the Philippines.
So, to recap real quick: on one side, we have the pro-human rights and democratic United States, which is trying to keep countries from invading each other and doing evil things, which we should all agree is a good idea.
Then we have the Axis, led by China, which is super anti-human rights â killing its own citizens for speaking out, cleansing religious minorities, and wanting to take territory from other countries.
I think we can all agree that this is worse than the U.S.-led order, no matter your personal criticisms of the U.S.
And these Axis countries are on the move against the U.S.
Xi has stated many, many, many times over the years that they must weaken and topple the United States. For example, China just conducted the worst foreign hack of U.S. cell networks in modern history, targeting many U.S. politicians.
But why?
Because, in short, we are the only major power that could stop China from succeeding in its territorial conquests.
Whether you prefer to see the U.S. as an evil empire or not, ever since WW2 ended, we know that relationships between countries have, on average, become more peaceful:
This is thanks to the United States acting as the policeman of the world (which we should be helped with) and telling everyone:
âitâs not very demure to invade your neighbors and invade other countries or massacre others.â
Donât forget â killing each other was the M.O. for nearly all of human history.
Now, so far weâve covered:
Why the world led by the U.S. is better than the evil alternative of a world run by China & Russia
Why China is actively trying to weaken the U.S.
So letâs complete this circle by:
Explaining in phases how the U.S. losing a war to China would be terrible for you
How the U.S.âs response to Russia invading Ukraine may determine Chinaâs (or Xiâs) decision to invade Taiwan
Phase 1: China beats the U.S. in a war and takes over Taiwan â this means China would control the largest (by far) global supply of things called semiconductors, which are in nearly all electronic devices you use every day â cars, computers, phones, many appliances, etc.
This would be really bad because China would be keen to cut off the U.S. from semiconductors.
Remember, China has very little to gain economically from this war, but, as told best by economist Noah Smith:

My girlfriend: âBut wait, pause â what are the odds China could actually beat us?â
Great question. This is where the intensity of my fear comes in.
Iâm no military expert, but wars usually last years.
And wars are won with ammunition and weapons.
To make this stuff, you have to have factories, or the ability to manufacture things.
During WW2, the U.S. had tons of private companies with factories, like Ford, so the U.S. government was able to use those factories to manufacture weapons.
Thatâs how we won in WW2 - by out-manufacturing our enemies.
So now that you know that, youâll understand why this graph below scares me (even more than parabolas did in high school calculus).
China easily manufactures more than double what the U.S. can alone, so we only stand a chance against them with our allies:

The New Allies may look pretty good, but thatâs only if the EU + UK can join us. If the U.S. is fighting China, Europe will probably still be dealing with Russia.
More importantly, the U.S. is not the manufacturing superpower that we once were, but China is.
People think weâre still the United States of the 1990s, when our military was MUCH bigger.
Not anymore.

China makes more steel in 1 hour than the U.K makes in a year. They make more steel in 10 days than the U.S makes all year. Let that sink in.
â Dan Collins (@DanCollins2011)
8:56 PM ⢠Dec 20, 2024
So, to answer my girlfriendâs question - manufacturing more weapons than the U.S. Thatâs how China beats us.
Phase 2: China becomes the global superpower â if youâre China and just won WWIII, why would you EVER let your biggest rival (the U.S.) build back to challenge you again?
Hint: you wouldnât â you just spent DECADES undermining them and won. So this means that China wonât just make the U.S. sign papers that say âthe U.S. lost đĽş.â
China would most likely decide to do a few things to the U.S. (a.k.a, you):
Cut off key trade routes through the Pacific that the U.S. relies on = Americans would be cut off from essential imports and trading partners. This would make things MUCH more expensive
Crush any industries in the U.S. that would boost the American economy and compete with Chinese companies. This would make us have less well-paying jobs
Hack all major civilian infrastructure (power plants, water sanitation facilities, dams, etc.). China would threaten to destroy these or cause our civilians harm, if the U.S. tries to build back up against them.
With China keeping the American economy in the crapper constantly, you would definitely be poorer.
The oceans around the United States will not save you from the world of modern warfare and technology.
My girlfriend: âok but how likely is it that China will actually invade Taiwan?"
I meanâŚâŚ. pretty likely.
The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) has been screaming to the world, not subtly, âWE WANT TO INVADE TAIWANâ for many years.
Before WW2, ergo, nuclear bombs and integrated economies, this is basically how rival nations dealt with each other: if youâve got the bigger stick than the next guy and want what they have, then you use that bigger stick to get what you want.
Weâre already seeing early signs of conflict â Chinaâs maritime militia is clashing with the Philippines on the oceans over disputed territories. We shouldnât forget that this is similar to the lead up to World War II â an accumulation of minor conflicts between rival nations.
Another key detail - when Xi decides to pull the trigger, he may strike U.S. bases in the Pacific first, as a gamble.
Why? Because the U.S. will most likely decide to help Taiwan (good!), so Xi wants to decrease the odds of losing to the U.S. as much as possible.
If your enemy is going to join the fight anyways, why not strike first when theyâre vulnerable and open?
My girlfriend: âWait⌠I thought I asked you about Ukraine???â
**cracks knuckles** you sure did.
China is studying.
With Xiâs dream on the brain, he has to watch very closely how the world (especially the U.S.) responds to a huge foreign rival like Russia trying to conquer its peaceful neighbor Ukraine.
Theyâre also observing (via Ukraineâs war with Russia) how modern warfare may be waged with the U.S. in a war over Taiwan.
So (1) the U.S. needs to continue to divest from China, (2) build up our manufacturing at home, and (3) really need Europe to wake up and do more for Ukraine.
If Ukraine loses, Russia will most likely carry on to Poland (which is why Poland is building up their military like crazy â they know this) and other European countries.
This means Europe would officially be in all-out war with Russia.
And the United States too, because, ya know, that little thing called NATO â âan attack on one is an attack on all.â Poland is a member of NATO.
Xi is watching, and he DEFINITELY hopes Russia gets to Poland.
Why do you think China is sending weapons to Russia and North Korea has sent soldiers to Russia?
And why is Xi hoping Putin gets to Poland? Because once Poland is invaded, the U.S. (along with NATO) would have to send our American soldiers to fight in Europe.
With U.S. attention there, Xi would give the order â invade Taiwan.
Now, the U.S. is fighting a two-front war, and remember: the U.S. is not the manufacturing power we once were in World War II.
And whether we like it or not, the worldâs dictators are on the move.
Sadly, my Roman Empire is this.
Still curious?
Thanks for taking the Pack,
Zach
So what'd you think? |
Before you go â itâd mean the world to me if you could share Z-Pack with just 1 person who you think would enjoy it too.
Please share and encourage them to subscribe - thank you 𫶠https://zpack.beehiiv.com/subscribe

actively lowering my IQ so I can have a great weekend
â sigh swoon (@sighswoon)
8:38 PM ⢠Dec 21, 2024
Me when my family asks what I want for Christmas
â âď¸đWreath Nagyđâď¸ (@nagy_minaj)
3:07 AM ⢠Dec 16, 2024
đ¤ If you got this from a friend, sign up here
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice or recommendation for any investment. The Content is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Reply