- Z-Pack š
- Posts
- š "Farm-to-table" doesn't matter
š "Farm-to-table" doesn't matter
Welcome to Z-Pack: a newsletter guaranteed to make sure youāre not the dumbest at dinner.
If this is your first Z-pack, welcome - I'm Zach.
Iām chronically online, finding out how the world works.
ā¬ļø Letās get it.
š¹ Smell the roses, yāall
Below is a tweet from the account, i/o, taking the account, Culture Critic, to school on how things were NOT all sunshine and rainbows in the American past.
1955 (clockwise from upper-left):
Dad is a WW2 vet with PTSD and compensatory alcoholism.
The non-air-conditioned family car will be dead at 70,000 miles. 1/4 of people can't afford a car. The average new home is 1,000 square feet.
Only 6% of the population has a college⦠twitter.com/i/web/status/1ā¦
ā i/o (@eyeslasho)
1:53 PM ⢠Mar 23, 2024
Iāve heard both sides of the American political spectrum fantasize about the American past - from the libs thinking of the abundant nature & pre-microplastics days to the conservatives thinking like the image above.
But theyāre both wrong.
Yall, letās please be real - life in the US is SO much better now than it was generations ago.
Donāt believe me?
Hereās a list of just a few things of what Americans in the 50s (and before) had to deal with:
No A/C
Kids died way more often and way earlier
Disease was way worse and could easily leave you with long-term damage
Fewer civil rights (of course)
Electronics were not as near as cool or cheap as they are now - phones, TVs, battery-powered items, etc.
But most importantly - no Advil or Pepto for the hot girls with their tummy aches - hello!!!
To wrap up, anytime I get in the dumps about problems we still need to figure out, I think of how there are thousands upon thousands of people working on these issues 24/7 - and theyāre making progress.
š® How to flush your trash
Imagine if sewage worked the same way as most trash systems do today
In the analogy, we'd be leaving daily excrement in bins on the street rather than an underground system whooshing it away š©
Our cities could be so much healthier (and less stinky!) if we wanted
ā Devon āļø (@devonzuegel)
4:24 PM ⢠Mar 22, 2024
Everything around us was built and designed by people just like you and me.
Which means that it can be changed.
From turning tons of car lanes into greenery-lined bike lanes, like in Paris, to building lots of housing, like Austin, TX*
So why not shake up how we do trash?
*fun fact: Austin has permitted more housing than LA, San Francisco, & San Diego COMBINED for 2024.
š± Hope-ium for the masses.
Really incredible that someone can be good at running companies full of rocket scientists (SpaceX) or brain surgeons (NeuraLink) but then totally š©the šļø running a social media site.
It really makes you wonderā¦
ā Dare Obasanjoš (@Carnage4Life)
2:45 AM ⢠Mar 23, 2024
Aside from Dareās point about Elon Musk being a genius with his other companies but not X/Twitter, this big decline in social media usage is good, methinks.
Itās good because social media companies arenāt making us more social - theyāre not designed to do that. Tbh, theyāre just designed to keep you using the app.
So this means keeping your eyes glued to the content thatāll keep you engaged - whether itās violence, negative headlines, celebrity images, etc.
The more we can leave our echo chambers to get out and touch grass, the better.
š Farm-to-table doesnāt matter
Why it matters much more what you eat than where it's from: transportation makes up a tiny share of greenhouse gas emissions for most products
ā Dina D. Pomeranz š£ (@DinaPomeranz)
7:41 AM ⢠Mar 23, 2024
The whole farm-to-table thing is kind of⦠whack. Why? Not because Iām a hater. Itās just misguided. When we think of āfarm-to-table,ā we typically associate it with less emissions, because the farm is closer.
Turns out, this really doesnāt matter when it comes to global emissions. Instead, we need to focus on WHAT we eat, not on where the food is from, to have an actual impact on reducing global emissions.
To the men who think we should go back to a hunter-gatherer lifestlye: those days are long gone.
Why? Because thereās not enough land and animals to hunt for all of us to make it. If everything went to hell and we all tried hunting and gathering, billions would die.
To feed all of us 8 billion humans, we rely on BIG crop yields (the amount of crops we can grow on the same amount of land) and LOTS of industrial fertilizers and pesticides. So if I had to choose between (a) everyone gets fed, or (b) billions starve, Iām going with the former.
What will we be eating in the future? Lab-grown meat on an industrial scale, baby. Which is also good! It means everyone gets fed with same quality food + an end to our brutal slaughterhouses.
Trying to reduce your personal emissions?
Focus on eating less beef, like once or twice a week.
For more details: Hannah Ritchie, lead researcher at Our World in Data, broke down the problems behind āorganicā labelled-food and farm-to-table with Derek Thompson on Spotify.
š§Ø Some thoughts to start your week
I can't stop thinking about this quote:
"Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75." - Benjamin Franklin
You get one chance at this life.
Be relentless in your pursuit of your dreams.
ā Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom)
1:40 PM ⢠Mar 24, 2024
āUnspoken expectations are premeditated resentments.ā
ā Neil Strauss
ā Shane Parrish (@ShaneAParrish)
2:17 PM ⢠Mar 24, 2024
-especially when it comes to your friends, partner and family. Communicate, communicate, communicate - people arenāt mind-readers.
Thanks for taking the Pack,
Zach
So what'd you think? |
š¤ Donāt forget to spread the wealth:
š¤ If you got this from a friend, sign up here
Disclaimer: This is not financial advice or recommendation for any investment. The Content is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Reply